0
$0.00
Cart
X

Your Cart

Senior HASC Lawmaker Forbes Presses Navy On UCLASS Requirements

Posted by Colin Clark on


UCLASS Lockheed

CAPITOL HILL: A member of Congress, Rep. Randy Forbes, is so concerned about a new Navy program and its future importance that he has written Navy Secretary Ray Mabus about the requirements of the service’s promising drone known as UCLASS. (Scroll down to read the full document).

This is the second time Forbes, chairman of the House Armed Services seappower and power projection force subcommittee, has expressed his views to the Navy on UCLASS. We broke the story last time, when he and his ranking member, Mike McIntyre, wrote Mabus last September urging the Navy to buy a stealthy drone able to carry a large weapons payload.

We understand some on Capitol Hill would like UCLASS to incorporate so-called broadband stealth, which permits a plane to penetrate very high-frequency radars such as those China and Russia are developing. While BAE Systems is not expected to be a UCLASS competitor, their new Taranis drone may be designed for broadband stealth (tip of hat to my colleague Bill Sweetman at Aviation Week).

The main competitors for the UCLASS contract are expected to be Boeing, General Atomics, Lockheed Martin (pictured at top) and Northrop Grumman, the builder of the UCLASS precursor, the X-47B.

130517-N-YZ751-017 ATLANTIC OCEAN (May 17, 2013) An X-47B Unmanned Combat Air System (UCAS) demonstrator conducts a touch and go landing on the flight deck of the aircraft carrier USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), marking the first time any unmanned aircraft has completed a touch and go landing at sea. George H.W. Bush is conducting training operations in the Atlantic Ocean. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Tony D. Curtis/Released)

The X-47B drone scoots off the back end of the USS BUSH flight deck and back into the sky after its first “touch and go.”

Forbes pushes aerial refueling, lethality and payload in addition to survivability as key requirements the Navy should focus on. Forbes, noting this is the Navy’s “only currently planned unmanned strike aircraft,” argues the plane should be able to meet both the needs of carriers and of combatant commanders, appearing to argue that it should possess long range and long loiter time so it isn’t limited to supporting the carrier fleet.

Forbes to Sec. Mabus 2-18-2014 UCLASS by BreakingDefense

What do you think?